Digg It
#1 in Business Subscribe Email Print

You are here: Home > Business > Careers Employment > Should Salaries and Incentives be linked with Performance?

Tags

  • where
  • upward
  • combination products
  • performance evaluation
  • possible scores

  • Links

  • Upgrading The US Will Not Be An Easy Task
  • Why Can Acupuncture Be The Right Form Of Alternative Treatment?
  • Public Speaking and Presenting: Making This Your Best Year Ever!
  • Digg It - Should Salaries and Incentives be linked with Performance?

    When the spiritual teacher and his disciples began their evening meditation, the cat who lived in the monastery made such noise that it distracted them. So the teacher ordered that the cat be tied up during the evening practice. Years later, when the teacher died, the cat continued to be tied up during the meditation session. And when the cat eventually died, another cat was brought to the monastery and tied up. Centuries later, learned descendants of the spiritual teacher wrote scholarly treatises about the re
    According to USFDA, a combination product is one composed of any combination of a drug and device; biological product and device; drug and biological product
    ligious significance of tying up a cat for meditation practice.

    The traditional view in organizations has always been to link Salaries and incentives to Performance. And I wanted to question this tradition. Every good company in this world has a performance evaluation (P.E.) system. Salaries are linked to this P.E. . Even incentives such as extra training, monetary bonuses, freebies are given to the best performers. Joel Spolsky confirmed my theory that P.E. should not be conducted.

    In April,2000 Joel wrote a b
    ; or drug, device, and biological product and fixed dose combination would include two or more combinations of drug.

    Examples of combination products may in
    autiful article - Incentive Pay Considered Harmful. I visit Joel's site, joelonsoftware.com, regularly and love reading his articles. These are the main points highlighted in this wonderful article -

    Treating your rocket scientist employees as if they were still in kindergarten is not an isolated phenomenon. Almost every company has some kind of incentive program that is insulting and demeaning. Most Performance review programs are copied from a Dilbertesque management book where the first stage is an "anony
    lude drug-coated devices, drugs packaged with delivery devices in medical kits, and drugs and devices packaged separately but intended to be used together.

    ous" upward reviews, followed by optional "self-evaluation" forms. Finally there is a numerical score, in lots of non-scalar categories like "works well with others", from 1-5, where the only possible scores were actually 3 or 4.

    The system never took into account the fact that people have different and unique talents, all of which are needed for a team to work well such as a person who motivates everyone else when the going got tough or someone who is incredibly insightful strategically Negative reviews, obvi
    here is enormous increase in the number of combination products entering the market in the recent years. Combination products have proven advantages but fixe
    ously, have a devastating effect on morale. In fact, giving somebody a review that is positive, but not as positive as that person expected, also has a negative effect on morale.

    The effect of reviews on morale is lopsided: while negative reviews hurt morale a lot, positive reviews have no effect on morale or productivity. Most people will be disappointed by their reviews because most people think that they do pretty good work (even if they don't). It's just a little trick our minds play on us to keep life bea
    d dose combinations are still in the process of convincing regulatory authority on their advantages over the single ingredient formulations.

    Combination pro
    able. Incentives (or bribes) simply can't work in the workplace. It leads to teamicide: the inadvertent destruction of jelled teams. Giving somebody positive reinforcement (such as stupid company ceremonies where people get plaques) implies that they only did it for the lucite plaque; it implies that they are not independent enough to work unless they are going to get a cookie; and it's insulting and demeaning. For 5 years I believed very word of what Joel said. I even made sure that we do not have any stup
    ucts have become life saving products for the pharmaceutical companies who doesn’t have many innovative molecules in their product pipeline and have been inc
    d company ceremonies or have any performance evaluations in Poornam. I even sat down to write why Performance Evaluation and Incentives are bad. I was a lot like the learned descendants of the spiritual teacher who wrote scholarly treatises about the religious significance of tying up a cat for meditation practice. I never questioned Joel's views.

    Today I firmly believe that Performance Evaluations is a must and it must be linked to salaries and incentives.

    Consider an Athletics Coach not timing his sprinters.
    easingly used in the product life cycle management. Even the companies having product patents are trying to extend their product life cycle through the combi
    He just tells them to run everyday. It would be a matter of time before the sprinters would get tired and would stop running. So what does he do. He sets the goal. If you are a 100 meters sprinter then first and foremost you are told that if you have to be the best in the world you have to beat 9.78 seconds. i.e. first define the target or set the expectations. Now the coach starts to time the sprints and evaluates his technique, speed, capability and so on. And after each evaluation the coach works out on ways t
    nation products and maximize the revenues. But the companies involved in this practice are overlooking that they are burdening the patients both economically
    improve the performance further. This is exactly why Performance Evaluation should be done.

    Let's take another example. Consider an automobile company which makes cars. If they decide to take out a new model and if it is a one bad car,even if they made a million more in the same technique they would not become the best car makers. They will however becomes experts in making bad cars. So what should they do. First, they define what a "Good Car" is. Then they make it and see how the customer reviews its perform
    and physically. They need to rightly judge the benefits of the combination products and they have to even look at the risks involved when combining the produ
    nce. Based on this evaluation from the customers the Car Maker improves upon the cars and slowly they become experts.

    In Management there is a beautiful concept called "PDCA" cycle Plan, Do, Check, Act. Performance evaluations work on similar systems and the target of an P.E. system is continual improvement of the organization and the individual.

    Most Performance Evaluation Systems are based on this principle of setting the expectations and then evaluating the progress.

    Treating your rocket scientist employees
    ts. Some of the combination products were well accepted by physicians while others suffered. Companies involved in development of combination products are fi
    as if they were still in kindergarten is not an isolated phenomenon. Almost every company has some kind of incentive program that is insulting and demeaning. Even a Rocket Scientist needs to know his expectations when he goes to work. Infact a great rocket scientist once told me that all rocket scientists are earthlings like you and me. They wear their pants just like we do, one leg at a time. If telling a rocket scientist or any other professional his work expectations is wrong, then P.E. is also wrong. If gau
    ding difficulty in defining their combination products and facing various challenges from selecting a combination to marketing it.

    Following aspects would a
    ging the work of the person based on the expectations is wrong, then certainly the incentive system is insulting.

    Most Performance review programs are copied from a Dilbertesque management book where the first stage is an "anonymous" upward reviews, followed by optional "self-evaluation" forms. Finally there is a numerical score, in lots of non-scalar categories like "works well with others", from 1-5, where the only possible scores were actually 3 or 4.

    I fully agree that rating between 1-5 or 1-100 is a silly
    dd to the challenges in developing combination products:

    Which markets to tap where the combination products can do fairly well?
    Which combination prod
    thing. One of the best things I like about the software industry is the fact that everything is represented in binary. i.e. 0 or 1. In my view all evaluations should be similar. The only two possible scores are 0 (no) or 1(yes). e.g. How is his quality of code? - 0 if it is bad 1 if it is good.

    For many this concept may seem harsh. In my entire career I have seen that we either win or loose. i.e. 1 or 0 is a reality of life. When I used to handle the sales in our company, many a times I had faced a situation w
    cts are meaningful and rational?
    Which therapeutic categories to select?
    Which Combinations can address unmet needs of the patients?
    Do combin
    ere Poornam/Bobcares would be made to compete with 3 or 4 other providers. In the beginning I used to think "Oh, we just missed it. Our quote was second best, we did well". Then I realized being second best does not allow us to grow or have the best people. One has to be win or loose.

    The system never took into account the fact that people have different and unique talents, all of which are needed for a team to work well such as a person who motivates everyone else when the going got tough or someone who is incr
    tions increase the patient compliance?
    What would be the developing cost?
    How to tackle the risks encountered during combination product developmen
    edibly insightful strategically. Let's take the example of the Athletics Coach again. Suppose he was training a team for a 4x100 meters relay. Would it help if 3 were great sprinters and the forth was slow but did a great job by keeping the others happy by singing. I guess that team would never make it to the top. Maybe the coach could hire a singer to keep them happy.

    It is true that gauging just one quality is bad. For example if "lines of code" is the only criterion for judging a person then the system is w
    t?

    As combination products don't fit into the traditional categories of drugs, medical devices, or biological products, the USFDA is in the process of devel
    ong not the concept. One has to review all the qualities that are needed for the job.

    Negative reviews, obviously, have a devastating effect on morale. In fact, giving somebody a review that is positive, but not as positive as that person expected, also has a negative effect on morale.

    The effect of reviews on morale is lopsided: while negative reviews hurt morale a lot, positive reviews have no effect on morale or productivity. Most people will be disappointed by their reviews because most people think that
    ping new procedures for reviewing their safety, efficacy and quality.

    Professional from academic institutions, pharmaceutical industries, health care indust
    hey do pretty good work (even if they don't). It's just a little trick our minds play on us to keep life bearable. Performance Evaluations would definitely make the under performers sad. They have two choices - they can either quit or improve. If they quit it is good for the organization. And if they improve it is great for the organization as well as the individual.

    Incentives (or bribes) simply can't work in the workplace. It leads to teamicide: the inadvertent destruction of jelled teams. Giving somebody
    y and representatives from various regulatory agencies are working out to design the regulatory requirements for manufacture and sale of combination products
    positive reinforcement (such as stupid company ceremonies where people get plaques) implies that they only did it for the lucite plaque; it implies that they are not independent enough to work unless they are going to get a cookie; and it's insulting and demeaning. I looked up in the dictionary and found out the meaning of the word - Bribe.

    bribe

    n : payment made to a person in a position of trust to corrupt

    his judgment Bribe \Bribe\, v. i.

    1. To commit robbery or theft. [Obs.]

    [1913 Webster]

    2. To giv
    .

    As there is an increasing trend of the combination products companies manufacturing such products should be able to tackle the problems involved in the de
    a bribe to a person; to pervert the judgment or

    corrupt the action of a person in a position of trust, by

    some gift or promise.

    [1913 Webster]

    Now is giving an incentive a bribe. Definitely Not. No organization gives an incentive for doing an illegal work. Also, if incentives are wrong then I guess even salaries should be considered as a bribe. "You work and for that work I'll give you money at the end of the month ;-)".

    Incentives are given only to the best to perform better. And the only only way to guag
    elopment. They need to be wiser in analyzing the market trends and the regulatory requirements.

    Companies that provide selfless information through particip
    this performance is by performance evaluations.

    Many a times people do feel that company ceremonies are stupid because they get plaques. Well one reason for it the way the reward is seen. For many the plaque is just an object which does not cost a lot. I am sure if the reward is a million dollars these same people would want company ceremonies very hour. In the Olympics the top honor is just a piece of money which anybody can buy..... But yet for many athletes an Olympic Gold is the very purpose of their life


    tion in industry events and feedback to regulatory authorities would be able to face the challenges and will be successful in developing combination products

    HTTP = HTML link (for blogs, profiles,phorums):
    <a href="http://www.diggit.org.ua/article/12408/diggit-Should-Salaries-and-Incentives-be-linked-with-Performance.html">Should Salaries and Incentives be linked with Performance?</a>

    BB link (for phorums):
    [url=http://www.diggit.org.ua/article/12408/diggit-Should-Salaries-and-Incentives-be-linked-with-Performance.html]Should Salaries and Incentives be linked with Performance?[/url]

    Related Articles:

    CPA Firms

    Advertising Strategies: Which One Is Right For Your Business?

    Branding-The Emperors New Clothe-Part I

    Bookmark it: del.icio.us digg.com reddit.com netvouz.com google.com yahoo.com technorati.com furl.net bloglines.com socialdust.com ma.gnolia.com newsvine.com slashdot.org simpy.com shadows.com blinklist.com