Digg It
#1 in Business Subscribe Email Print

You are here: Home > Business > Management > TQM Implementation Project Part 5b – A Case Study on Problem in Implementing Improvement Project

Tags

  • action
  • during
  • device
  • biological product
  • production supervisor

  • Links

  • Hair Styles Online: The Power You Always Wanted
  • ASP Web Hosting
  • Risk and HR Managers Must Work Together
  • Digg It - TQM Implementation Project Part 5b – A Case Study on Problem in Implementing Improvement Project

    This TQM article, is a continuation from Part 5a published on [June 01, 2006 08:10:51 pm]. I will share about problem or difficulties faced by the team when they use the tools in the IMPROVE PHASE.
    According to USFDA, a combination product is one composed of any combination of a drug and device; biological product and device; drug and biological product
    Let’s see how we can handle problem or difficulties with Control lot and testing and Pilot the action / solution tools in the D.A.I.C. methodology for Improvement.

    Just to recap, tools use
    ; or drug, device, and biological product and fixed dose combination would include two or more combinations of drug.

    Examples of combination products may in
    d in the IMPROVE Phase are listed below. In this article, I will cover the tools in bold:

    Brainstorming of action / solution | Selection Grid | Benchmarking | Cost-Benefit Analysis| Control lot
    lude drug-coated devices, drugs packaged with delivery devices in medical kits, and drugs and devices packaged separately but intended to be used together.

    and testing | Pilot the action / solution | Force-Field Analysis | Prevention Planner

    Problem with Control Lot and Testing
      It is quite a challenge to use this tool not the tool itself
    here is enormous increase in the number of combination products entering the market in the recent years. Combination products have proven advantages but fixe
    but the planning go with it when need to run a control lot. First of all, the team need to consider several issues namely; Size of the control lot, duration of run, what parameter need to confirm, who wi
    d dose combinations are still in the process of convincing regulatory authority on their advantages over the single ingredient formulations.

    Combination pro
    ll be involved, when to run it? Which shift to run it, and how is data to be collected. Due to lack of experience, the team struggle with it

    I had a case where the team needs to confirm 4 process paramet
    ucts have become life saving products for the pharmaceutical companies who doesn’t have many innovative molecules in their product pipeline and have been inc
    ers. When the control lot is in progress, team members set the 4 parameters at the same time then data is collected. At the end of the run, data collected are not useful to make any correlation as they di
    easingly used in the product life cycle management. Even the companies having product patents are trying to extend their product life cycle through the combi
    not provide any pattern.

    How to Overcome Control Lot and Testing Problem
      Team need to understand the inter-relationship between each of the four parameters and how it influences
    nation products and maximize the revenues. But the companies involved in this practice are overlooking that they are burdening the patients both economically
    the coating thickness. By requirement, the team needs to run four control lots for each of the parameter as a variable separately. In another word, the team needs to adjust one parameter setting with the
    and physically. They need to rightly judge the benefits of the combination products and they have to even look at the risks involved when combining the produ
    rest the three locked. The idea is to see the effect of one parameter to the thickness by turn.

    Problem with Pilot the action / solution
      During the case of coating thickne
    ts. Some of the combination products were well accepted by physicians while others suffered. Companies involved in development of combination products are fi
    s, the team has confirmed the various setting after the control lot run. During the pilot run, team run into trouble even though all the four parameter wee set according to the new requirements. Productio
    ding difficulty in defining their combination products and facing various challenges from selecting a combination to marketing it.

    Following aspects would a
    n supervisor may over react and set the four parameters back to the old setting. It did not help either. As a result, reject for coating thickness increased dramatically. How to Overcome Pil
    dd to the challenges in developing combination products:

    Which markets to tap where the combination products can do fairly well?
    Which combination prod
    ot the action / solution Problem
      When conducting the pilot run, team member must be around to work with the production supervisor to give him confidence about the new settings. When things m
    cts are meaningful and rational?
    Which therapeutic categories to select?
    Which Combinations can address unmet needs of the patients?
    Do combin
    ight go wrong, team members need to verify other process parameters before any change to the control lot parameter are changed. Team members need to explain to the production supervisor that process param
    tions increase the patient compliance?
    What would be the developing cost?
    How to tackle the risks encountered during combination product developmen
    ters are sensitive to influence the outcome of the product. Therefore, all process parameters must be set in accordance to standards.

    In summary, to minimise problem arising from changes to pr
    t?

    As combination products don't fit into the traditional categories of drugs, medical devices, or biological products, the USFDA is in the process of devel
    oicess parameters, communication play an important role. A briefing to the objective of the pilot would help to munimise surprise not only to the production staffs, also to the team members. Now that the
    ping new procedures for reviewing their safety, efficacy and quality.

    Professional from academic institutions, pharmaceutical industries, health care indust
    solution seem working alright, the team should move into the the CONTROL PHASE which will be my next article.

    ----------------------------------------------------------------

    Disclaimer:<
    y and representatives from various regulatory agencies are working out to design the regulatory requirements for manufacture and sale of combination products
    r> All rights reserved. This article is written by the author based on his practical application experience. All definitions and interpretation of terminology are his point of view and has it has no inte
    .

    As there is an increasing trend of the combination products companies manufacturing such products should be able to tackle the problems involved in the de
    ntion to conflict with experts in similar topic. The author holds no responsibility for the use of this article in any way.

    Free to reprint or re-publish:
    All rights reserved. You are free to
    elopment. They need to be wiser in analyzing the market trends and the regulatory requirements.

    Companies that provide selfless information through particip
    reprint or re-publish this article as long as you include my resource box at the end of this article. Please ensure that the URL in the resource box remain intact and it is linked to the author's website


    tion in industry events and feedback to regulatory authorities would be able to face the challenges and will be successful in developing combination products

    HTTP = HTML link (for blogs, profiles,phorums):
    <a href="http://www.diggit.org.ua/article/22700/diggit-TQM-Implementation-Project-Part-5b--A-Case-Study-on-Problem-in-Implementing-Improvement-Project.html">TQM Implementation Project Part 5b – A Case Study on Problem in Implementing Improvement Project</a>

    BB link (for phorums):
    [url=http://www.diggit.org.ua/article/22700/diggit-TQM-Implementation-Project-Part-5b--A-Case-Study-on-Problem-in-Implementing-Improvement-Project.html]TQM Implementation Project Part 5b – A Case Study on Problem in Implementing Improvement Project[/url]

    Related Articles:

    Career Advice - Nothing Happens Until You Sell Yourself! How To Promote Your Career

    Using WYSIWYG to Improve Your Job Seeking Results

    It is Time to Work for Yourself

    Bookmark it: del.icio.us digg.com reddit.com netvouz.com google.com yahoo.com technorati.com furl.net bloglines.com socialdust.com ma.gnolia.com newsvine.com slashdot.org simpy.com shadows.com blinklist.com