| Digg It |
Hubs | Hubbers | Topics | Request |
| #1 in Business | Subscribe Email Print |
|
You are here: Home > Business > Business > Current Estimate of Economic Impact of Options Backdating |
|
Digg It - Current Estimate of Economic Impact of Options Backdating
I had a discussion with Erik Lie about the experiences with Stock Options Backdating (SOBD) and the economic impact of his work According to USFDA, a combination product is one composed of any combination of a drug and device; biological product and device; drug and biological product . According to Erik, at least 15% of the stock options grants between 1996 to August, 2002,were backdated. Some were within 30 ; or drug, device, and biological product and fixed dose combination would include two or more combinations of drug. Examples of combination products may in ays of the grant date, others more egregious. The number of companies though he said that were going to come clean would be far lude drug-coated devices, drugs packaged with delivery devices in medical kits, and drugs and devices packaged separately but intended to be used together. less than 15%. Here is what we came up with. First the assumptions: 1. # of companies that actually are investigated or asked here is enormous increase in the number of combination products entering the market in the recent years. Combination products have proven advantages but fixe by the SEC (currenty June 03 is 42) by June 2006 = 100 2. # of companies that will complete the 3 step process of preliminary d dose combinations are still in the process of convincing regulatory authority on their advantages over the single ingredient formulations. Combination pro investigation, comprehensive audit and finally restatement of results (approximately at 30-50%) = 40 3. Approximate amount of ucts have become life saving products for the pharmaceutical companies who doesn’t have many innovative molecules in their product pipeline and have been inc ime spent performing the initial investigation = 4-6 weeks. 4. Approximate time spent doing comprehensive audit = 20-32 weeks easingly used in the product life cycle management. Even the companies having product patents are trying to extend their product life cycle through the combi 5. Costs in back taxes, delisting, restatement, defending lawsuits & fines = 30% of cumulative value of option grants 6. Size nation products and maximize the revenues. But the companies involved in this practice are overlooking that they are burdening the patients both economically of company assumed on average: $500M in revenues, 2500 employees, 25+ grants under inquiry 7. Grant value net = $15M per incid and physically. They need to rightly judge the benefits of the combination products and they have to even look at the risks involved when combining the produ nt If you want to do your own analysis (how much will this cost my company), feel free to use some of these estimations. # Ex ts. Some of the combination products were well accepted by physicians while others suffered. Companies involved in development of combination products are fi ense Item Description Cost 1 Initial Investigation Typically done by Board & Audit team $1.5 M 2 Communication expenses ding difficulty in defining their combination products and facing various challenges from selecting a combination to marketing it. Following aspects would a Economic impact of communication loss to company $4M 3 Audit fees Formal investigation fees for auditors $30M 4 Restatemen dd to the challenges in developing combination products: Which markets to tap where the combination products can do fairly well? Which combination prod costs Includes delisting, cost of documentation, $9 M 5 Taxes and fines Back taxes owed to IRS, Fines by SEC $15 M 6 Lega cts are meaningful and rational? Which therapeutic categories to select? Which Combinations can address unmet needs of the patients? Do combin fees Defending lawsuits on backdating $20M Subtotal For each company, $500M revenue $79.5M Assuming 50 companies Completely tions increase the patient compliance? What would be the developing cost? How to tackle the risks encountered during combination product developmen go over the end to end process $3.975B Assuming remaining companies Remaining companies only go over steps 1 & 3 $1.75 B t? As combination products don't fit into the traditional categories of drugs, medical devices, or biological products, the USFDA is in the process of devel e>The other part of the economic impact stems from losses in market capitalization. If you estimate currently (42 companies) lo ping new procedures for reviewing their safety, efficacy and quality. Professional from academic institutions, pharmaceutical industries, health care indust t over $63 Billion in Market capitalization (United Healthcare itself accounted for over 30% of this number) over the last 9 mo y and representatives from various regulatory agencies are working out to design the regulatory requirements for manufacture and sale of combination products nths. Assume that will be 50% less (since the bad news is out) for the remaining 50+ companies. The impact is another $31B. We . As there is an increasing trend of the combination products companies manufacturing such products should be able to tackle the problems involved in the de lso did a detailed analysis on this portion of the impact. Total Impact of Stock Option Backdating ~ $100 Billion. For each co elopment. They need to be wiser in analyzing the market trends and the regulatory requirements. Companies that provide selfless information through particip tion in industry events and feedback to regulatory authorities would be able to face the challenges and will be successful in developing combination products
HTTP = HTML link (for blogs, profiles,phorums):
Related Articles:Who Are the Various Taxing Authorities and Why Am I Never Able to Find the Right Person? How Corporate Governance Impacts Investors Medical Billing - GU0 Record Fields 59 Through 61
|