| Digg It |
Hubs | Hubbers | Topics | Request |
| #1 in Business | Subscribe Email Print |
|
You are here: Home > Business > Business > Ramifications of the Options Backdating Scandal for 2007; Some Questions |
|
Digg It - Ramifications of the Options Backdating Scandal for 2007; Some Questions
What are the top 3 ramifications of the options backdating scandal? If you remove the usual According to USFDA, a combination product is one composed of any combination of a drug and device; biological product and device; drug and biological product tax consequences, shareholder lawsuits, restatement, etc. What things do we see coming down i ; or drug, device, and biological product and fixed dose combination would include two or more combinations of drug. Examples of combination products may in terms of legislation/new rules and regulations and where are the opportunities? 1. Revisiti lude drug-coated devices, drugs packaged with delivery devices in medical kits, and drugs and devices packaged separately but intended to be used together. ng Executive compensation: It supposed to be aligned with shareholder, but as examples of Cyb here is enormous increase in the number of combination products entering the market in the recent years. Combination products have proven advantages but fixe ronics points out, not exactly. We see examples of Google, Apple and Yahoo paying their Chief d dose combinations are still in the process of convincing regulatory authority on their advantages over the single ingredient formulations. Combination pro Executives only $1 as their pay and rest in options compensation. Will this change? Will com ucts have become life saving products for the pharmaceutical companies who doesn’t have many innovative molecules in their product pipeline and have been inc anies completely stop paying salaries? Or will they stick to giving options to top executives easingly used in the product life cycle management. Even the companies having product patents are trying to extend their product life cycle through the combi alone? 2. Board of Director accountability: Boards do have a responsibility to shareholders nation products and maximize the revenues. But the companies involved in this practice are overlooking that they are burdening the patients both economically Would we see an increase in number of boards requesting higher coverage from D&O insurance? and physically. They need to rightly judge the benefits of the combination products and they have to even look at the risks involved when combining the produ Are boards going to have their own "internal spies" in each company to help report on interna ts. Some of the combination products were well accepted by physicians while others suffered. Companies involved in development of combination products are fi controls audits? Will board members request oversight and have responsibility over internal ding difficulty in defining their combination products and facing various challenges from selecting a combination to marketing it. Following aspects would a olicies and procedures? 3. Fewer people use stock options: Many companies have started to re dd to the challenges in developing combination products: Which markets to tap where the combination products can do fairly well? Which combination prod duce overall the number of stock grants and options to employees. There are many reasons, inc cts are meaningful and rational? Which therapeutic categories to select? Which Combinations can address unmet needs of the patients? Do combin uding expensing of stock options, backdating scandal, etc. What other alternative forms exist tions increase the patient compliance? What would be the developing cost? How to tackle the risks encountered during combination product developmen of incentive pay? Restricted stock has the same problems as options, i.e. if priced at the w t? As combination products don't fit into the traditional categories of drugs, medical devices, or biological products, the USFDA is in the process of devel ong time, they will have potential to drain stock holder value. 4. Audit responsibilities: M ping new procedures for reviewing their safety, efficacy and quality. Professional from academic institutions, pharmaceutical industries, health care indust any clients we have currently deploy another set of auditors (besides the one they already us y and representatives from various regulatory agencies are working out to design the regulatory requirements for manufacture and sale of combination products ) to have an "independent" third party for internal investigation. Will this continue after t . As there is an increasing trend of the combination products companies manufacturing such products should be able to tackle the problems involved in the de he backdating has been squared away? Is there a need for a auditor to audit your auditor? In elopment. They need to be wiser in analyzing the market trends and the regulatory requirements. Companies that provide selfless information through particip tion in industry events and feedback to regulatory authorities would be able to face the challenges and will be successful in developing combination products
HTTP = HTML link (for blogs, profiles,phorums):
Related Articles:Where Can You Find Products At Wholesale Pricess? Medical Billing: To Save Or To Insure
|