| Digg It |
Hubs | Hubbers | Topics | Request |
| #1 in Business | Subscribe Email Print |
|
You are here: Home > Business > Negotiation > Effective Negotiation Skills: A Practical Application |
|
Digg It - Effective Negotiation Skills: A Practical Application
Negotiations are often associated with labor union contract, with strongly held positions, or with conflicting situations. However, looking at negotiating from a better perspective, we are surprised to find that it is much a part of our daily life. Daily, we bring negotiations into our relationships, our businesses, and our employment practices. According to USFDA, a combination product is one composed of any combination of a drug and device; biological product and device; drug and biological product In recalling the different negotiations in which I have been involved, one stands clearly in my mind. It was a performance appraisal meeting at a former place of employment. I can recall how the meeting took place and its unproductive results. Later I learned effective negotiation skills that would have produced a winning outcome for all parties i ; or drug, device, and biological product and fixed dose combination would include two or more combinations of drug. Examples of combination products may in nvolved. Performance appraisals were conducted once a year in my former organization. I dreaded that review because a new manager that had not observed the employees' job performance would conduct it. Rumor had it that she would evaluate every one as merely competent employees, and contrary to my expectations, the rumor turned out to be true. My lude drug-coated devices, drugs packaged with delivery devices in medical kits, and drugs and devices packaged separately but intended to be used together. performance appraisal meeting became no more than a full review of all the dimensions in my job description. To each dimension she attached an equal sign to signify that I had performed as expected. There were no instances in which she thought that I had performed above expectations, and with that, I firmly disagreed. Not only did I disagree, but here is enormous increase in the number of combination products entering the market in the recent years. Combination products have proven advantages but fixe also I sensed I was becoming angry and resentful. In that meeting, I took the position approach described in Fisher and Ury (1991) in their book Getting to Yes . I let my supervisor know that I was not in agreement with her and began to explain my view of my own performance, which I carefully backed with facts and figures. I made sure she unders d dose combinations are still in the process of convincing regulatory authority on their advantages over the single ingredient formulations. Combination pro tood that I deserved a much better rating. She took the position approach as well. She reinstated that all of my facts showed that my performance was as expected, and no more. I tried with examples to convince her, but she had taken a stand and would not back down. I did likewise. We were locked in our positions and did not reach a satisfactory ag ucts have become life saving products for the pharmaceutical companies who doesn’t have many innovative molecules in their product pipeline and have been inc reement. That performance review caused me to feel as if I had been in a battlefield and lost. I began to see my supervisor as my adversary and our work relationship suffered. I learned that the position approach does not produce a wise or beneficial outcome for either party. If the situation were to occur again, I could handle that negotiation i easingly used in the product life cycle management. Even the companies having product patents are trying to extend their product life cycle through the combi n a much better way. The circumstances would be the same. My new supervisor would have little knowledge of the employees' performance for the previous months and would opt for a competent evaluation across the board. I would be rated as a competent employee also. But here is where I would differ from my real experience. My new negotiation approac nation products and maximize the revenues. But the companies involved in this practice are overlooking that they are burdening the patients both economically h would be principle negotiation, negotiation on the merits. I would begin by separating the people from the problem, as outlined by Fisher & Ury (1991) in the book Influence. In this case, separating the people from the problem meant to understand why she felt compelled to evaluate me in such way. Perhaps she was told to do so by her own supervi and physically. They need to rightly judge the benefits of the combination products and they have to even look at the risks involved when combining the produ sor, or may be she understood this to be a fair way of evaluating a performance that she had not observed. Regardless of the reasons, my new approach would be not to take it as a personal criticism, and I would remind myself that the ongoing relationship is more important than the outcome of that review. My next step would be to focus on our comm ts. Some of the combination products were well accepted by physicians while others suffered. Companies involved in development of combination products are fi on interests. I have learned that the aim of an appraisal system is to improve the employee?s performance. It should be goal oriented and it should point out an employee's specific needs for training and development. So rather than taking positions over my work in the previous twelve months, the content of the new meeting would be to identify a sp ding difficulty in defining their combination products and facing various challenges from selecting a combination to marketing it. Following aspects would a ecific performance goal and to develop a plan of action to achieve the goal during the next performance period. If I were given a chance to go through that performance evaluation meeting again, this is what I would say: "I really appreciate that you consider me a competent employee. That is what I strive for, and yet I would like to be more than dd to the challenges in developing combination products: Which markets to tap where the combination products can do fairly well? Which combination prod competent. If you would agree with me, I would like for the two of us to focus on the future and on how I can improve my performance. It has been our organization's practice to measure performance by the objective set the previous performance period. I would like to work with you and to set goals for my development for the next twelve months." To cts are meaningful and rational? Which therapeutic categories to select? Which Combinations can address unmet needs of the patients? Do combin w principles should work in the proposal made above, reciprocity and precedence. The principle of reciprocity says that we should repay what another person has provided for us. One of the consequences of this principle according to Cialdini (1993) is that we would feel obligated to make a concession to someone who has made a concession to us. In i tions increase the patient compliance? What would be the developing cost? How to tackle the risks encountered during combination product developmen gnoring an average evaluation, I would have made a concession. By referring to our organization's past practice regarding performance, I would be establishing precedence. I would expect that my supervisor would have agreed to focus on a common goal if I had taken this approach. Developing options for a plan of action for the next performance peri t? As combination products don't fit into the traditional categories of drugs, medical devices, or biological products, the USFDA is in the process of devel od would not be a difficult task at that point. A number of options would be listed that would satisfy my supervisor as well as myself. Ownership of the ideas would belong to both, and surely a plan for improved performance would bring about mutual gain. Once my supervisor has agreed to develop a plan of action for the next performance period and ping new procedures for reviewing their safety, efficacy and quality. Professional from academic institutions, pharmaceutical industries, health care indust has worked with me on a list of options, a third principle of persuasion should come into play, the principle of commitment and consistency. Commitment according to Cialdini (1993) means that there is a natural tendency to behave in ways that are consistent with the stand that we have taken. At this point, I would expect to see the old way of rat y and representatives from various regulatory agencies are working out to design the regulatory requirements for manufacture and sale of combination products ing employees near the average or middle of the scale should be gone forever. The proposed type of appraisal meeting is based on an objective criteria and it focuses on solving problems rather than finding faults. It looks to the future and it yields to principles, not pressures. In a real life situation, a performance appraisal meeting, effectiv . As there is an increasing trend of the combination products companies manufacturing such products should be able to tackle the problems involved in the de e negotiation skills can be used for mutual gain. In examining the positions that can be taken, it is clear that a position stand does not produce a satisfactory outcome for either party. Utilizing effective negotiation skills that bring about a winning outcome for all, includes separating the people from the problem, focusing on mutual interest, elopment. They need to be wiser in analyzing the market trends and the regulatory requirements. Companies that provide selfless information through particip inventing options for mutual gain, and using objective criteria. Principles of persuasion, reciprocity, precedence, ownership, commitment and consistency are additional valuable tools in negotiations. REFERENCES Fisher, R. & Ury, W. (1991). Getting to Yes . New York: Penguin Books. Cialdini, R. (1993). Influence . New York: William Morro tion in industry events and feedback to regulatory authorities would be able to face the challenges and will be successful in developing combination products
HTTP = HTML link (for blogs, profiles,phorums):
Related Articles:How To Find Cost Efficient Business Cards From Online Printers Buy A Business With This Secret And Get Anything You Want From The Seller
|