| Digg It |
Hubs | Hubbers | Topics | Request |
| #1 in Business | Subscribe Email Print |
|
You are here: Home > Business > Careers Employment > Law School Rankings - The Biggest Bunch of Bunk Since Unsliced Bread |
|
Digg It - Law School Rankings - The Biggest Bunch of Bunk Since Unsliced Bread
Although I understand that this can be very difficult to do, you must view the popular published law school rankings skeptically. These rankings are not only untrustworthy, but mislead students into thinking they need to attend a hi According to USFDA, a combination product is one composed of any combination of a drug and device; biological product and device; drug and biological product ghly ranked school or they will be second rate lawyers do to their "substandard" law school education. This is simply not true. What is true, in my opinion unfortunately, is that going to a highly ranked law ; or drug, device, and biological product and fixed dose combination would include two or more combinations of drug. Examples of combination products may in school can have an enormous financial (note: NOT educational) impact on your early legal career. That is why I wrote Covert Tactics for Getting Into the Law School of Your Choice. As I explain in that book, however, lude drug-coated devices, drugs packaged with delivery devices in medical kits, and drugs and devices packaged separately but intended to be used together. even if you do not attend a highly ranked law school, you are not absolutely doomed to suffer professionally and financially for the rest of your life. Indeed, many times you may be well-served, both educationally and financially, by here is enormous increase in the number of combination products entering the market in the recent years. Combination products have proven advantages but fixe attending a lower ranked law school. But back to law school rankings. In addition to a number of studies suggesting that the data underlying the rankings is inaccurate, due to schools trying to misrepresent the true data in order d dose combinations are still in the process of convincing regulatory authority on their advantages over the single ingredient formulations. Combination pro to achieve a higher ranking, it is impossible for any ranking to consider all of the relevant factors, which may vary from individual to individual. Also problematic is the fact that most of the ranking are based, at least in part, on the ucts have become life saving products for the pharmaceutical companies who doesn’t have many innovative molecules in their product pipeline and have been inc subjective opinions of individuals at the various schools. Of course, such subjective opinions are likely to simply reinforce the historical opinions regarding the "top tier" law schools. Indeed, if you look at these rankings historicall easingly used in the product life cycle management. Even the companies having product patents are trying to extend their product life cycle through the combi y, you will find that they really haven't changed much over the years. The reason that it is important that you understand the invalidity of the law school rankings is that you should understand that the quality of your legal education is nation products and maximize the revenues. But the companies involved in this practice are overlooking that they are burdening the patients both economically likely to be nearly as good, and in some respects may be better, at the University of Idaho as opposed to Harvard. Depending on who you are, you may be much better off, for a variety of reasons, attending even a very low ranked scho and physically. They need to rightly judge the benefits of the combination products and they have to even look at the risks involved when combining the produ ol. This may be the case even if you have the opportunity to attend a higher-ranked school. For example, if your intent is to establish a small town practice in rural South Dakota immediately after law school, it may be unwise to attend S ts. Some of the combination products were well accepted by physicians while others suffered. Companies involved in development of combination products are fi tanford Law School over the University of South Dakota School of Law. Why? Let me give you three good reasons, though there are likely many more. First, you are not going to be particularly highly paid in rural South Dakota, regardless ding difficulty in defining their combination products and facing various challenges from selecting a combination to marketing it. Following aspects would a of where you attended law school. As a Stanford Law graduate you are likely to either be saddled with a high debt load or have spent a significant amount of your savings getting through school. Although few law schools are cheap, yo dd to the challenges in developing combination products: Which markets to tap where the combination products can do fairly well? Which combination prod u should carefully consider whether it is worth spending and extra $100,000 to have a fancy name on your wall. Second, as a small-town practitioner, you are going to be very reliant on relationships with other attorneys, the business commu cts are meaningful and rational? Which therapeutic categories to select? Which Combinations can address unmet needs of the patients? Do combin nity, and potential clients in general. Spending three years in Palo Alto, far away from the center of your future universe, will do very little to develop those relationships, so law school rankings are virtually meaningless. Finally, th tions increase the patient compliance? What would be the developing cost? How to tackle the risks encountered during combination product developmen e education isn’t going to be much better at Stanford than at USD. Believe me, in writing this I have prepared myself for the inevitable barrage of criticism that will inevitably be hurled my way. I say this with confidence, howeve t? As combination products don't fit into the traditional categories of drugs, medical devices, or biological products, the USFDA is in the process of devel r, because I know lawyers from a wide variety of law schools and find a relatively equal distribution of idiots among alumni from top 50 and bottom 50 schools. It really depends on what you are willing to put into it – not what they give y ping new procedures for reviewing their safety, efficacy and quality. Professional from academic institutions, pharmaceutical industries, health care indust ou. There are even some law schools not approved by the American Bar Association that may be worth considering in limited situations. Depending on what you want to do, and the particular laws of the jurisdiction where you intend to y and representatives from various regulatory agencies are working out to design the regulatory requirements for manufacture and sale of combination products practice, a non-ABA accredited school may be a worthwhile choice. At the end of the day, you need to make a wise choice that you will be happy with for the rest of your life. Don’t put a school on your list just because it is a hi . As there is an increasing trend of the combination products companies manufacturing such products should be able to tackle the problems involved in the de ghly-ranked law school or fits a formula or because you think it will look good on your resume. Even if we find a cure for cancer in the next decade, you are not likely to live much more than 90 years on this earth. Don’t spend 3.5% of it elopment. They need to be wiser in analyzing the market trends and the regulatory requirements. Companies that provide selfless information through particip in the wrong place. This article may be freely reprinted or distributed in its entirety in any ezine, newsletter, blog or website. The author's name, bio and website links must remain intact and be included with every reproduction. tion in industry events and feedback to regulatory authorities would be able to face the challenges and will be successful in developing combination products
HTTP = HTML link (for blogs, profiles,phorums):
Related Articles:Design Risk Assessment In Six Sigma How To Realistically Set Your Fees - Part 5
|